Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Saving Shoreditch with our Collective Voice

The failure of a public consultation process has called for collective action across London’s East End.

That is how change is brought about by the way. By the masses uniting and converging on something they deeply believe in.

This is exactly what happened on November 27th, 2013. The anonymous group called the East End Preservation Society born out of disdain and discontent for the commercial and residential development plans, which were announced for Shoreditch with no discussion or input by the local community.

The society had something to say, very loudly and very clearly: That heritage will always come first before height.

The society was in fact responsible for the rescue of The Marquisof Lansdowne pub, which was intended to be demolished by the Geffrye Museum.

“In this climate, where democratic decision-making is being undermined and public consultation reduced to a cynical public relations exercise… this was a joyful exception to the rule, proving that strength of public feeling can still be successful in saving an old building,” it was reported in their website.

All photos by Jason Di-Candilo @billthebadger

 “If we can work collectively in large numbers, we can have a stronger influence upon the culture of development that threatens old buildings and be more powerful in our individual campaigns to save them,” they added.

At the centre of their concerns is the Hammerson and Ballymore’s gigantic £800 million Bishopsgate Goodsyard scheme, presently one of the largest derelict sites in inner London. It is proposed to add 3.7 sq ft of residential, retail and office space including up to 2,000 new homes. That’s six large towers, rising from a height of 25 storeys to two vast 40-plus-storey blocks measuring almost 600ft high.

The problem?

The site is home to a low-rise historic neighbourhood containing no fewer than five conservation areas and is primarily defined by low- to medium-rise brick, light-industrial warehouses and residential terraces.

In fact, it was formerly the home of Bishopsgate station, which was built in 1840 and was in regular use until it was closed and converted into a goods yard in 1881. The depot was in operation until it was largely destroyed by a fire in 1964, after which a long period of dereliction ensued. After an equally contentious planning and legal battle in the early 2000s, most of the remaining structure was demolished in 2003 to make way for the new East London line extension, which the current Shoreditch High Street station built on the site serves.


 The scheme represents much more than actually meets the eye, the Society explains.

It represents the endless controversial debates around tall buildings and affordable housing, and it also touches on wider contentious issues like regeneration, gentrification, employment, social and cultural exclusion, urban identity and the adequacy of the planning system. Therefore, whatever happens at Bishopsgate Goodsyard will have an influence that stretches far beyond its borders they warn.

The Society also claims that “43 per cent of the existing surrounding buildings surveyed by the developer’s consultants will suffer major loss of sunlight” and that “a large amount of 19th century historic fabric surviving on the site will be demolished” if current plans go ahead.

They also offer a blunt cautionary statement to planners: “Should a development of this size and scale be permitted, it will mark a new and disturbing chapter in the expansion of the City into the East End, expansion that threatens to destroy the life, character and diversity that makes this area special,” according to their website.


Jules Pipe, the Mayor of Hackney, issued an impassioned plea for people to sign his petition against the Bishopsgate Goodsyard development in February.

“These luxury flats will cast a shadow over the whole of Tech City and threaten to damage the local creative economy. The repercussions could be so severe they lead to the loss of thousands of local jobs.”

Mr Pipe added: “It is totally out of scale for Shoreditch, and the whole development’s 10 per cent affordable housing figure is derisory.”

“It has taken twenty years or more for Shoreditch and Brick Lane to develop into the areas they are. It has been hard won, and is now something, which brings economic and social success to the local community. This development promises to severely damage all of that success in a way which cannot be overturned,” he explained.

The East End Preservation Society invites all people who care about the East End and are concerned about the future of its built environment to join their community to help the collective voice get heard.


 Will you join?

Question: How we can act collectively, like a true community, to stand up for our neighbourhood? Share your thoughts in the comment box below.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leah Davies is a purpose-filled writer, human rights activist and coach for budding wordsmiths, who is driven to cultivate change through our stories. Her social business Paper Planes Connect is a place to celebrate our difference and to unite in our sameness. Using her experience as a journalist and international development worker, she supports the social conscious to platform their voice and create change, both big and small.






1 comment:

  1. Thank you for this article!

    We urgently need to show collective opposition to the Goodsyard plans - anyone who disagrees with the proposals should sign the new petition calling for them to be rejected:

    https://www.change.org/p/local-councils-and-the-gla-reject-the-bishopsgate-goodsyard-development-proposals

    Having signed the petition people can also formally object using the More Light More Power guidelines here:
    http://www.morelightmorepower.co.uk/object

    ReplyDelete